Publicado el

Keep in mind that no analysis tested sexting thru sexually direct chatting by yourself

Keep in mind that no analysis tested sexting thru sexually direct chatting by yourself

Studies Quality Testing

The latest imply study high quality get along the 41 articles appointment addition requirements are six.2 (eTables step one and 2 throughout the Enhance). One or two knowledge (cuatro.9%) dropped regarding the lower-top quality assortment, and you will ten training (twenty four.4%) were regarding moderate-high quality range, towards the leftover 29 education (70.7%) throughout the higher-high quality variety. Both degree considered getting lowest methodological high quality were got rid of out of analyses. Hence, the rest 39 knowledge were chosen for subsequent meta-analyses.

Try Properties out-of Provided Training

A total of 39 training met all the studies and methodological introduction criteria. Training were readily available for sending (n = 34) visite el sitio web aquГ­, researching (letter = 20), forwarding in the place of consent (letter = 5), otherwise having good sext sent instead of agree (letter = 4). The fresh Table summarizes integrated degree. In total over the 39 training, 110 380 professionals had been included, that have a hateful period of age (age range, 11.9-17.0 many years). An average of, 47.2% off participants was indeed men. Twenty-one or two studies (56.4%) were regarding You, several degree (29.8%) was out of European countries, 2 knowledge (5.1%) was in fact regarding Australia, step 1 analysis (dos.6%) was out of Canada, step one analysis (2.6%) was out of Southern area Africa (dos.6%), and you will step 1 study (dos.6%) try off Southern Korea. To try to get knowledge (46.2%) tested sexting using cell phones and you will machines, having six training (15.4%) having fun with servers only, fourteen studies (thirty five.9%) through cell phones simply, and one study (2.6%) delivering decreased pointers to own commitment. Eleven degree (28.2%) expected users in the sexting thru photo, 14 studies (thirty five.9%) through photographs otherwise video, seven studies (17.9%) thru images and you can/or explicit texts, and you can 7 studies (17.9%) through images, films, and/or direct texts. Fundamentally, 30 knowledge (79.5%) was blogged in the peer-assessed publications, and you can 8 knowledge (20.5%) were unpublished.


Abbreviations: Both, research concentrates on sexting thru both a smart phone or the internet; FW-P, investigation concentrates on whether or not respondents mutual others’ sexts instead their concur; FW-V, studies focuses on whether or not respondents had sexts distributed to someone else in place of its agree; M, intimately explicit messages; Mobile, investigation focuses primarily on sexting via smartphones; NCPTUP, National Venture to stop Teenager and you will Unplanned Maternity; On line, study centers around sexting over the internet; P, pictures; R, study is targeted on acquiring texts; S, research centers around sending texts; Unspecified, analysis does not provide enough information to choose the form regarding sexting; V, video.

Shared Incidence off Sending good Sext

The random-effects analysis of the 34 studies on sending a sext yielded a mean prevalence of 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) ( Figure 2 ). The Egger test provided evidence that studies with smaller sample sizes had more extreme prevalence estimates (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the presence of potential outliers, and one study was identified. Heterogeneity of effect sizes remained present with (Q = , P

Forest Patch of your own Feeling Items each Investigation Found in the brand new Meta-analysis towards the Prevalence out-of Delivering good Sext

Revealed was a tree plot out of education included in the meta-investigation. The overall summary estimate to own giving a sext is 14.8% (95% CI, twelve.8%-16.8%). NCPTUP ways National Promotion to quit Teenager and you can Unplanned Maternity.

A beneficial meta-regression research shown a good linear rise in prevalence because years enhanced (b = 0.037; 95% CI, 0.024-0.050). Effect products had been as well as moderated from the 12 months off analysis data collection, which have a demonstrated rise in the new frequency away from sending a good sext throughout the years (b = 0.026; 95% CI, 0.012-0.039). Messaging outlet as well as told me between-research variability, that have a higher prevalence out of sexting towards the cell phones (k = 13; thirteen.4%; 95% CI, 9.0%-17.7%) weighed against computers (k = 4; 5.5%; 95% CI, 2.3%-8.6%), where k indicates the number of studies. Incidence wasn’t moderated by intercourse, geographical area, content blogs, otherwise book status.