Studies Quality Testing
The latest imply study high quality get along the 41 articles appointment addition requirements are six.2 (eTables step one and 2 throughout the Enhance). One or two knowledge (cuatro.9%) dropped regarding the lower-top quality assortment, and you will ten training (twenty four.4%) were regarding moderate-high quality range, towards the leftover 29 education (70.7%) throughout the higher-high quality variety. Both degree considered getting lowest methodological high quality were got rid of out of analyses. Hence, the rest 39 knowledge were chosen for subsequent meta-analyses.
Try Properties out-of Provided Training
A total of 39 training met all the studies and methodological introduction criteria. Training were readily available for sending (n = 34) lovingwomen.org visite el sitio web aquГ, researching (letter = 20), forwarding in the place of consent (letter = 5), otherwise having good sext sent instead of agree (letter = 4). The fresh Table summarizes integrated degree. In total over the 39 training, 110 380 professionals had been included, that have a hateful period of age (age range, 11.9-17.0 many years). An average of, 47.2% off participants was indeed men. Twenty-one or two studies (56.4%) were regarding You, several degree (29.8%) was out of European countries, 2 knowledge (5.1%) was in fact regarding Australia, step 1 analysis (dos.6%) was out of Canada, step one analysis (2.6%) was out of Southern area Africa (dos.6%), and you will step 1 study (dos.6%) try off Southern Korea. To try to get knowledge (46.2%) tested sexting using cell phones and you will machines, having six training (15.4%) having fun with servers only, fourteen studies (thirty five.9%) through cell phones simply, and one study (2.6%) delivering decreased pointers to own commitment. Eleven degree (28.2%) expected users in the sexting thru photo, 14 studies (thirty five.9%) through photographs otherwise video, seven studies (17.9%) thru images and you can/or explicit texts, and you can 7 studies (17.9%) through images, films, and/or direct texts. Fundamentally, 30 knowledge (79.5%) was blogged in the peer-assessed publications, and you can 8 knowledge (20.5%) were unpublished.
Desk.
Abbreviations: Both, research concentrates on sexting thru both a smart phone or the internet; FW-P, investigation concentrates on whether or not respondents mutual others’ sexts instead their concur; FW-V, studies focuses on whether or not respondents had sexts distributed to someone else in place of its agree; M, intimately explicit messages; Mobile, investigation focuses primarily on sexting via smartphones; NCPTUP, National Venture to stop Teenager and you will Unplanned Maternity; On line, study centers around sexting over the internet; P, pictures; R, study is targeted on acquiring texts; S, research centers around sending texts; Unspecified, analysis does not provide enough information to choose the form regarding sexting; V, video.
Shared Incidence off Sending good Sext
The random-effects analysis of the 34 studies on sending a sext yielded a mean prevalence of 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) ( Figure 2 ). The Egger test provided evidence that studies with smaller sample sizes had more extreme prevalence estimates (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the presence of potential outliers, and one study was identified. Heterogeneity of effect sizes remained present with (Q = , P
Forest Patch of your own Feeling Items each Investigation Found in the brand new Meta-analysis towards the Prevalence out-of Delivering good Sext
Revealed was a tree plot out of education included in the meta-investigation. The overall summary estimate to own giving a sext is 14.8% (95% CI, twelve.8%-16.8%). NCPTUP ways National Promotion to quit Teenager and you can Unplanned Maternity.
A beneficial meta-regression research shown a good linear rise in prevalence because years enhanced (b = 0.037; 95% CI, 0.024-0.050). Effect products had been as well as moderated from the 12 months off analysis data collection, which have a demonstrated rise in the new frequency away from sending a good sext throughout the years (b = 0.026; 95% CI, 0.012-0.039). Messaging outlet as well as told me between-research variability, that have a higher prevalence out of sexting towards the cell phones (k = 13; thirteen.4%; 95% CI, 9.0%-17.7%) weighed against computers (k = 4; 5.5%; 95% CI, 2.3%-8.6%), where k indicates the number of studies. Incidence wasn’t moderated by intercourse, geographical area, content blogs, otherwise book status.